Family Limited Partnerships for Real Estate Owners

How a family partnership can help consolidate control, transfer wealth, and create discipline around closely held real estate.

June 26, 2026

Family limited partnerships, often called FLPs, are one of the more useful planning structures for families who own real estate, but they are also one of the most misunderstood. They are not a magic tax wrapper. They are not a way to make property disappear from the IRS. At their best, they are a governance tool first and a tax-planning tool second.

The basic idea is simple. A family creates a limited partnership or limited liability limited partnership. The family contributes real estate, real-estate entities, cash, or related assets to the partnership. One person or entity usually serves as the general partner and controls management. Other family members may own limited partnership interests, which give them economic participation but little or no day-to-day control.

That split between control and economics is the reason FLPs are so common in real estate planning. Real estate often creates family wealth, but it also creates family friction. Someone has to decide when to refinance, when to lease, when to sell, how much cash to distribute, how repairs are funded, and who gets access to information. An FLP can put those rules in one governing agreement instead of leaving every major decision to a future family argument.

An FLP is a partnership among family members, typically organized under state law. The partnership has at least one general partner and one or more limited partners. The general partner manages the partnership. The limited partners usually have economic rights, such as the right to receive distributions, but they do not run the business.

For federal income-tax purposes, a partnership is generally a pass-through arrangement. The partnership itself is not usually subject to federal income tax. Instead, the income, deductions, gains, losses, and credits flow through to the partners under the partnership agreement and tax rules.¹ That makes the tax reporting more involved than simple individual ownership, but it also gives the family a flexible entity for pooling and allocating ownership.

For real estate owners, the FLP may hold property directly, or it may hold membership interests in LLCs that own individual properties. Many families prefer the second approach because each property can sit inside its own liability-protection entity while the FLP owns the family-level economic interests. The right structure depends on the properties, debt, insurance, lender requirements, state law, and the family's succession goals.

The family nature of the partnership does not make it invalid. The tax code recognizes family partnerships, but it also asks whether the person receiving an interest is the real owner of a capital interest where capital is a material income-producing factor.² That point matters for real estate, because real estate is capital intensive. The structure should reflect real ownership and real economics, not just labels on paper.

The most common reason is control. A parent may want to begin transferring wealth to children or trusts but still retain centralized management over properties. Giving children direct fractional interests in each building can create a mess. Every refinancing, sale, lease, or capital call may require coordination among multiple owners. An FLP can keep the decision-making authority centralized while gradually shifting economic interests.

The second reason is continuity. Real estate portfolios often outlive the founder. If the founder dies owning properties directly, the estate may leave heirs with divided interests, unclear expectations, and no operating playbook. An FLP can create a governing document before the transition happens. It can define who manages, how successors are chosen, when distributions are made, how transfers are restricted, and how disputes are handled.

The third reason is transfer planning. Instead of gifting a 10% undivided interest in an apartment building, the senior generation can gift a 10% limited partnership interest. That may be easier to administer, easier to value, and easier to coordinate with trusts. The family can make gifts over time, sometimes using annual exclusion gifts where appropriate and often using lifetime gift and estate-tax exemption for larger transfers.

The fourth reason is asset protection and family discipline. A well-drafted FLP agreement can restrict transfers to outsiders, require buy-sell procedures, limit creditor access to partnership assets, and keep an ex-spouse or judgment creditor from becoming an active co-owner of family property. These protections depend heavily on state law and cannot be treated as absolute, but the entity structure can be stronger than direct co-ownership.

The fifth reason is privacy and simplicity. Holding interests through an entity can reduce the number of deeds, assignments, and public transfers needed as ownership changes inside the family. That does not eliminate reporting or documentation, but it can make the family balance sheet easier to manage.

FLPs are often discussed because of valuation discounts. The concept is understandable. A limited partnership interest in a closely held family entity is usually not the same as owning cash or a freely marketable stock. A buyer of a minority limited partnership interest may lack control over distributions, sales, debt decisions, and liquidation. The interest may also be hard to sell. Because of those limitations, a qualified appraiser may apply discounts for lack of control and lack of marketability.

This can matter in gift and estate planning. If a parent gifts a limited partnership interest worth less than the proportionate value of the underlying real estate, more future appreciation may move to the next generation for the same amount of taxable gift. For families with meaningful real estate wealth, that can be powerful.

But this is also where families get into trouble. A valuation discount is not a coupon. It has to be supported by the partnership agreement, the underlying assets, state law, market evidence, and a qualified appraisal. The IRS and courts have challenged FLPs where the entity looked like a paper exercise, where the senior generation continued to use the assets as if nothing had changed, or where the stated business purpose was weak.

Section 2036 is one of the main rules to understand. In general terms, it can pull transferred property back into a taxable estate if the transferor retained possession, enjoyment, income, or certain control rights.³ For an FLP, that means the founder cannot treat the partnership like a personal checking account after the transfer. Distributions, expenses, leases, loans, and management decisions need to respect the partnership agreement and business purpose.

Section 2704 is another important rule. It deals with certain lapsing rights and restrictions in family-controlled entities.⁴ The technical details belong with the estate attorney and valuation professional, but the practical message is straightforward: restrictions inside a family entity are scrutinized. The family should assume the structure may need to be defended years later, often after the founder is gone.

The best candidates are families with concentrated, illiquid, closely held real estate. This may include families that own rental homes, commercial buildings, farmland, mineral interests, storage facilities, industrial property, development land, or interests in real-estate LLCs.

The structure tends to be most useful when the family has enough value and complexity to justify the cost. A single rental property with modest equity may not need an FLP. A family with several properties, multiple children, lender relationships, uneven liquidity, and estate-tax exposure has a different problem. The FLP can become the family's operating constitution for those assets.

FLPs are also common when one child is active in the real estate business and another child is not. The active child may be a logical manager, but the parents may still want all children to share in economic value. The partnership agreement can separate management rights from economic rights and define compensation for the family member doing the work.

They can also be useful for blended families. A surviving spouse may need income, while children from a prior marriage may be the long-term remainder beneficiaries. Direct co-ownership can create tension. A partnership or related trust structure can provide clearer economics and a more durable management process.

Families with taxable estates are natural candidates. For 2026, the federal estate and gift-tax basic exclusion amount is $15 million per person, and the annual gift-tax exclusion is $19,000 per recipient.⁵ Those are high thresholds, but real estate families can cross them quickly when leverage, appreciation, and concentrated property values compound over time. Even when the family is below the estate-tax threshold today, an FLP may still help with succession, creditor protection, and governance.

The first benefit is centralized management. The general partner can make property decisions without requiring every family member to sign every document. That matters when properties need fast decisions, lenders require clear authority, or tenants expect professional management.

The second benefit is planned ownership transfer. Parents can gift or sell limited partnership interests over time rather than transfer entire properties at once. That can make the succession plan more gradual and less disruptive.

The third benefit is keeping assets in the family. The partnership agreement can restrict transfers, create rights of first refusal, and prevent unwanted owners from entering the ownership group. This is especially important when heirs may divorce, face creditor claims, or have different financial priorities.

The fourth benefit is potential valuation efficiency. Limited partnership interests may qualify for discounts when transferred, depending on the facts. The discount is not the only reason to create an FLP, but it can be a meaningful secondary benefit when the structure is built and administered correctly.

The fifth benefit is family governance. A good FLP forces the family to answer hard questions early. Who controls the real estate after the founder? How are managers replaced? When can cash be distributed? How are capital calls funded? What happens if one branch wants liquidity and another branch wants to hold forever? These questions do not become easier after a death or dispute.

The first issue is cost and complexity. An FLP requires legal work, tax reporting, accounting, appraisals, annual administration, and often separate bookkeeping. If the family is not willing to run it like a real entity, it should not create one.

The second issue is loss of simplicity. Direct ownership is easy to understand. Entity ownership can be better, but it adds documents and process. Partners receive Schedule K-1s. The partnership may need to file Form 1065. Transfers need to be tracked. Capital accounts matter. Debt allocations can affect tax outcomes.

The third issue is lender and title coordination. Real estate debt often includes due-on-transfer provisions, lender consent requirements, and guarantees. Moving property into an FLP or related LLC without lender review can create problems. Title insurance, property insurance, leases, and local transfer taxes also need to be reviewed.

The fourth issue is retained control. Parents often like FLPs because they can keep management control, but too much retained control can weaken the estate-tax result. If the founder contributes property, keeps all meaningful economic benefit, pays personal bills from the partnership, and makes distributions only when personally convenient, the structure becomes vulnerable.

The fifth issue is commingling. Partnership accounts should be separate. Partnership expenses should be paid by the partnership. Personal expenses should stay personal. If the partnership pays for family vacations, personal homes, or unrelated expenses without proper treatment, the entity record becomes harder to defend.

The sixth issue is valuation discipline. Gifts of FLP interests should generally be supported by qualified appraisals. The appraisal should value the actual interest transferred, not simply apply a generic percentage discount. The family should retain the appraisal, governing agreement, financial statements, property information, and gift-tax filings in one permanent file.

The seventh issue is family conflict. An FLP can reduce conflict, but it cannot eliminate bad behavior. If one child controls the partnership and siblings believe the manager is under-distributing cash, overpaying themselves, or favoring one branch of the family, the entity can become the battlefield. The agreement should address reporting, compensation, removal rights, dispute resolution, and liquidity procedures.

The eighth issue is state law. Limited partnership protections, charging order rules, fiduciary duties, and creditor rights vary by state. Oklahoma, Texas, Colorado, and other states may handle details differently. The agreement needs to be drafted for the family's governing law and property footprint.

I would start with the non-tax purpose. If the only answer is "discounts," I would slow down. A strong FLP should have a real business reason: consolidated management, succession planning, creditor protection, family governance, pooling capital, or keeping fractionalized real estate from becoming unmanageable.

Next, I would inventory the assets. Which properties are owned directly? Which are already in LLCs? What debt exists? Are there personal guarantees? Are there partners outside the family? Are any properties subject to environmental risk, development risk, or pending sale negotiations? The structure should follow the asset map, not the other way around.

Then I would decide what the senior generation actually wants to give up. There is a difference between giving up economics and giving up control. Many plans work because the parents transfer limited partnership interests while retaining a general partner interest or using a controlled entity as general partner. That can be appropriate, but the attorney must coordinate the retained rights with estate-tax rules.

After that, I would model the transfer strategy. Some families gift limited partnership interests. Some sell interests to intentionally defective grantor trusts. Some combine an FLP with dynasty trusts, life insurance planning, or charitable planning. The right answer depends on estate-tax exposure, income needs, basis considerations, cash flow, and the family's willingness to administer the plan.

Finally, I would build the annual process before the first transfer. That means bookkeeping, entity minutes or written consents, appraisals, tax returns, K-1 delivery, distribution policy, debt tracking, insurance review, and a document retention system. In my view, administration is not a footnote. It is what separates a serious family partnership from a document that looked good when it was signed.

Family limited partnerships can be excellent tools for real estate owners because they match the nature of the asset. Real estate is illiquid, management-heavy, and often emotionally important to a family. An FLP can create a framework for control, continuity, and gradual transfer.

The trade-off is that the structure has to be real. The family needs a business purpose, a strong agreement, clean accounting, qualified valuations, and behavior that matches the paperwork. If the founder keeps treating the assets as personally owned, the planning can unravel.

For the right family, the FLP is not just an estate-tax technique. It is a way to turn a collection of properties into a governed family enterprise. That is where the planning has the most lasting value.

This piece is educational. The specifics are a conversation with us, your estate attorney, CPA, valuation professional, and real estate counsel before acting.

All my best,

Brandon VanLandingham, CFA, CMT, CFP

Founder / CIO

Lifetime Gifting Strategies for Families With $10M+

Estate Planning Documents Every Oklahoma Family Needs

Dynasty Trusts: Building Wealth That Lasts Generations

Irrevocable Life Insurance Trusts (ILITs): How They Work

[1] Internal Revenue Service, Publication 541, Partnerships. The IRS explains that a partnership generally passes through income, deductions, gains, losses, and credits to partners. https://www.irs.gov/publications/p541

[2] 26 U.S.C. Section 704(e), Cornell Law School Legal Information Institute. Family partnership interests are addressed where capital is a material income-producing factor. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/704

[3] 26 U.S.C. Section 2036, Cornell Law School Legal Information Institute. The statute addresses transfers where the transferor retains certain rights or enjoyment. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/2036

[4] 26 U.S.C. Section 2704, Cornell Law School Legal Information Institute. The statute addresses certain lapsing rights and restrictions involving family-controlled entities. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/2704

[5] Internal Revenue Service, Rev. Proc. 2025-32. The revenue procedure lists the 2026 federal estate and gift-tax basic exclusion amount at $15 million and the 2026 annual gift-tax exclusion at $19,000. https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-drop/rp-25-32.pdf

Perissos Private Wealth Management is a Registered Investment Adviser ("RIA"). Registration as an investment adviser does not imply a certain level of skill or training, and the content of this communication has not been approved or verified by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission or by any state securities authority. Perissos Private Wealth Management renders individualized investment advice to persons in a particular state only after complying with the state's regulatory requirements, or pursuant to an applicable state exemption or exclusion. All investments carry risk, and no investment strategy can guarantee a profit or protect from loss of capital. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

The information contained in this newsletter is intended to provide general information about market themes. It is not intended to offer investment advice. Investment advice will only be given after a client engages our services by executing the appropriate investment services agreement. Information regarding investment products and services is given solely to provide education regarding our investment philosophy and our strategies. You should not rely on any information provided in making investment decisions.

Market data, articles and other content in this material are based on generally available information and are believed to be reliable. Perissos Private Wealth Management does not guarantee the accuracy of the information contained in this material.

Perissos Private Wealth Management will provide all prospective clients with a copy of our current Form ADV, Part 2A (Disclosure Brochure), Part 2B (Supplemental Brochures), and Part 3 (Client Relationship Summary) prior to commencing an advisory relationship. You can also view these documents at any time at adviserinfo.sec.gov or by contacting us requesting a copy.