Dynasty Trusts: Building Wealth That Lasts Generations

How long-term trusts can move appreciation, governance, and transfer-tax exposure across generations.

June 16, 2026

Dynasty trusts sit at the intersection of estate tax law, family governance, and long-term investing. They are often described as "wealth transfer" tools, but that phrase is too narrow. A well-designed dynasty trust is not just about moving money to grandchildren. It is about deciding which assets should stay protected, professionally managed, and outside the estate-tax system as wealth passes from one generation to the next.

The topic matters more in 2026 because Congress changed the estate-planning backdrop. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act, enacted as Public Law 119-21 on July 4, 2025, increased the federal estate and gift tax basic exclusion amount to $15 million per person for calendar year 2026. The generation-skipping transfer, or GST, exemption is also $15 million per person for 2026, with inflation indexing scheduled after 2026.¹ A married couple therefore has a potential $30 million federal estate, gift, and GST planning framework in 2026 if the plan is structured and administered correctly.

That higher exemption gives families more room, but it does not remove the need for planning. The question is no longer just, "Can we beat the exemption sunset?" The better question is, "Which assets should be positioned so children, grandchildren, and future descendants can benefit from them without forcing each generation to restart the estate-tax clock?"

I view dynasty trusts like a long-term family vault with instructions attached. The vault can be powerful. The instructions matter just as much as the assets inside.

A dynasty trust is typically an irrevocable trust designed to last for multiple generations. The grantor transfers assets to the trust, a trustee manages those assets under the trust agreement, and beneficiaries can receive distributions under the standards the document allows. The trust may benefit children, grandchildren, great-grandchildren, and later descendants, depending on the drafting and state law.

The word "dynasty" is not a separate tax code label. It is a planning description. For tax purposes, the core concept is usually a long-term trust to which the grantor allocates GST exemption. The GST tax is imposed on generation-skipping transfers, and the tax code defines those transfers to include taxable distributions, taxable terminations, and direct skips.³ A skip person generally includes a natural person assigned to a generation two or more generations below the transferor, such as a grandchild, or certain trusts whose interests are held only by skip persons.³

That definition is the reason the GST exemption matters. Section 2631 allows each individual a GST exemption, and for 2026 that exemption equals the basic exclusion amount: $15 million.¹,⁴ If the right amount of GST exemption is allocated to the right trust at the right time, the trust can have a zero inclusion ratio. In plain English, that means future GST taxable distributions or terminations from that exempt trust are not supposed to carry GST tax.

The estate-tax goal is different but related. Assets transferred to a properly structured irrevocable trust, together with their future appreciation, may be outside the grantor's estate. If the trust remains properly structured, the assets may also avoid estate tax when the children die, because the children do not own the trust assets outright. They may benefit from the trust, but ownership and beneficial use are not the same thing.

The most common use is multi-generational transfer tax planning. The federal estate tax rate reaches 40% on the highest bracket under Section 2001, and the GST tax rate is tied to the maximum federal estate tax rate multiplied by the GST inclusion ratio.⁴ For families likely to remain above the federal exemption, a GST-exempt dynasty trust can reduce the risk that the same family capital is taxed at each generation.

Figure 1 illustrates the basic math. It assumes a $15 million transfer, 5% annual compound growth, no distributions, no income taxes, no fees, and a simplified 40% transfer tax at each 30-year generation point outside the dynasty trust.¹,⁴ It is not a projection. It is a mechanical illustration of why tax drag matters over long periods. Under those assumptions, the GST-exempt dynasty trust grows to about $1.21 billion after 90 years, while the transfer-taxed path ends around $262 million after three 30-year transfer-tax events. The point is not that any family should expect a straight 5% for 90 years. The point is that repeated transfer-tax leakage can dominate the long-term outcome.

Dynasty trusts are also used for asset protection. A beneficiary who receives assets outright owns them outright. Those assets can become part of a divorce negotiation, creditor dispute, lawsuit, or poor spending pattern. A trust can create a different result if the governing state law, the trust language, and the administration are aligned. The beneficiary may have access under health, education, maintenance, support, or discretionary standards, but not full ownership.

They can also support family governance. A trust can define who has distribution authority, whether descendants are treated equally or equitably, how education and health expenses are handled, whether beneficiaries can serve in governance roles, and how family business interests or real estate should be managed. That matters for wealth that is illiquid, concentrated, or tied to a family enterprise.

Finally, dynasty trusts can help keep investment policy consistent. The trust can own marketable securities, private business interests, real estate entities, life insurance, or other assets, subject to the trust agreement and fiduciary rules. Over decades, beneficiaries will marry, divorce, move, start businesses, experience health issues, and make different financial choices. The trust gives the family a way to keep capital under one investment and distribution framework instead of forcing every generation to rebuild the structure from scratch.

Figure 1: A simplified illustration of compounding inside a GST-exempt trust versus repeated 40% transfer-tax events.

The first step is design. The family decides who the trust is meant to benefit, how long it should last, who will serve as trustee, who can remove or replace trustees, whether a trust protector or distribution committee is appropriate, and which state law should govern. The state-law piece is not cosmetic. Trust duration, creditor protection, income taxation, decanting, directed-trust rules, privacy, and trustee powers vary by jurisdiction.

The second step is funding. A dynasty trust can be funded during life with a completed gift, at death through an estate plan, through a sale to a grantor trust, through life insurance owned by the trust, or through a combination of strategies. The simplest version is a completed gift that uses part of the grantor's lifetime gift tax exemption and part of the grantor's GST exemption. In 2026, a donor can also make annual exclusion gifts of $19,000 per recipient, but the annual exclusion applies only to gifts of present interests and is not the main funding tool for large dynasty trusts.²

The third step is reporting and allocation. Form 709 is not just a formality. The IRS instructions explain that gifts made through a trust may require attaching a certified or verified copy of the trust instrument to the first gift tax return reporting a transfer to that trust, and valuation support may be needed for real estate, closely held business interests, or other hard-to-value assets.⁵ The same instructions describe how direct skips, indirect skips, GST trust transfers, and automatic GST allocation elections are reported.⁵

This is where families can get themselves in trouble. The automatic allocation rules can be helpful, but they are not a substitute for a careful GST plan. A family may want GST exemption allocated to one trust but not another. A trust may have an estate tax inclusion period. A trust may be partly exempt and partly non-exempt. A return may need an election out, an election in, or a specific allocation. If the allocation is wrong, the tax cost may not show up for years.

The fourth step is administration. The trustee invests, keeps records, files trust tax returns if required, evaluates distributions, communicates with beneficiaries, and follows the document. A dynasty trust is not a "set it and forget it" structure. It is a long-running legal and tax arrangement. The longer the intended duration, the more important the trustee and governance design become.

The headline benefit is that future appreciation can compound outside the grantor's taxable estate. If a grantor transfers $10 million to a properly structured dynasty trust and the trust later grows to $30 million, the $20 million of appreciation may have shifted outside the grantor's estate. For a family that is otherwise exposed to a 40% federal transfer tax, that shifted appreciation is the core economic benefit.⁴

The GST benefit is the second layer. Without GST planning, a transfer to grandchildren or more remote descendants can create an additional tax layer on top of the estate and gift tax system. The GST tax was designed to prevent families from avoiding transfer tax at the children's generation by moving assets directly or indirectly to lower generations. A GST-exempt dynasty trust tries to solve that problem by allocating GST exemption up front so the trust can benefit multiple generations without a GST tax each time the child generation's interest ends or a taxable distribution is made to a skip person.³,⁴

There can also be an income-tax planning feature when the trust is structured as a grantor trust. In a grantor trust, the grantor may be treated as the owner for income tax purposes, with trust income, deductions, and credits included in the grantor's taxable income calculation to the extent the grantor is treated as owner.⁹ That sounds odd, but it can be efficient: the grantor's tax payment is effectively another way to let the trust compound. The trade-off is cash flow. The grantor needs the liquidity and willingness to pay taxes on income the trust may retain.

For families with closely held businesses or real estate, the trust can be especially valuable before major appreciation occurs. If a non-voting business interest is transferred to a dynasty trust before a sale, recapitalization, or large increase in value, the future upside may occur outside the grantor's estate. That requires serious valuation work and timing discipline. If the transaction is already far along, the IRS may challenge the value or argue that the economic event was effectively already assigned.

The non-tax benefits are often the reason the trust survives the math test. Tax savings are valuable, but they are not enough by themselves. A dynasty trust can protect assets from a beneficiary's poor judgment, addiction issues, future divorce, creditor claims, or business risk. It can also protect a beneficiary from receiving more liquidity than he or she is ready to manage.

The trust can also create consistency. Families often want to help descendants with education, medical needs, a first home, business opportunities, or emergency support, but they do not want every beneficiary to have the same unrestricted access. A dynasty trust can be drafted around standards instead of automatic distributions. That allows the trustee to respond to facts rather than distribute capital simply because a beneficiary reached a certain birthday.

Another benefit is stewardship. If the family owns a business, ranch, real estate partnership, or concentrated investment asset, the dynasty trust can help separate economic benefit from control. Voting authority, distribution policy, buy-sell provisions, and management succession can be coordinated with the trust instead of left to an outright inheritance. That can reduce conflict among descendants who have different levels of involvement.

I also like the way a properly drafted trust can force clarity. It makes the family answer hard questions while the grantor is alive: Who should make decisions? What is the money for? Should distributions be equal, need-based, incentive-based, or discretionary? How should spouses of descendants be treated? Who can remove a trustee? What happens if a beneficiary has special needs? Those questions are not technical footnotes. They are the plan.

The first trade-off is control. A completed gift to an irrevocable dynasty trust is not the same as moving money between accounts. The grantor should not assume the assets can be taken back later. Some modern trust designs can include powers of appointment, trust protectors, substitution powers, decanting flexibility, or jurisdictional flexibility, but those tools do not turn an irrevocable gift into a revocable one.

The second trade-off is income tax. Trusts reach the top federal ordinary income tax bracket quickly. For taxable years beginning in 2026, estates and trusts reach the 37% bracket above $16,000 of taxable income. A married couple filing jointly does not reach the 37% bracket until taxable income exceeds $768,700.⁶ The capital gains thresholds are also compressed: estates and trusts reach the top 20% long-term capital gains bracket above $16,250, while married joint filers reach that threshold above $613,700.⁶ Figure 2 compares those thresholds. This is why distribution policy, grantor-trust status, asset location, tax-loss harvesting, and realization timing matter inside a dynasty trust.

The third trade-off is basis. The IRS gift tax FAQ states that when property is received by gift, the recipient's basis is generally the donor's basis.² Section 1014 generally gives property acquired from a decedent a basis equal to fair market value at death, subject to exceptions.⁷ Those two rules create one of the biggest planning tensions. Moving a low-basis asset to a dynasty trust may remove future appreciation from the estate, but it may also sacrifice a future basis step-up if the asset would otherwise have been included in the estate. For families below the estate-tax threshold, basis can matter more than estate tax.

The fourth trade-off is cost and administration. A dynasty trust needs legal drafting, trustee services, accounting, tax reporting, investment oversight, beneficiary communication, and periodic review. If the trust owns business interests, private real estate, insurance, or partnership assets, the administrative burden increases. The structure has to justify that burden.

The fifth trade-off is family complexity. The grantor is making decisions for people who may not be born yet. That is the point of the structure, but it is also the risk. A provision that sounds wise in 2026 may feel restrictive in 2056 or irrelevant in 2086. Good drafting leaves room for judgment without making the trust so loose that it fails to accomplish the grantor's goals.

Figure 2: 2026 federal income-tax thresholds for estates and trusts versus married joint filers.

The biggest watch-out is overfunding. A dynasty trust can be tax-efficient and still be a mistake if the grantor gives away assets needed for retirement spending, health care, philanthropy, business commitments, or liquidity. Before funding a large irrevocable trust, I would want the donor's post-transfer balance sheet modeled under conservative return, spending, inflation, tax, and health-care assumptions. The tax savings do not help if the donor loses financial flexibility.

The second watch-out is poor asset selection. High-growth assets are often better candidates than low-growth assets because the goal is to move appreciation. Low-basis assets require extra caution because of the basis trade-off. Retirement accounts require a separate analysis because trust ownership and beneficiary rules can interact poorly with income tax and distribution rules. Life insurance can fit well in certain structures, but insurance should be stress-tested as part of the plan, not used as a shortcut.

The third watch-out is GST allocation. The IRS instructions for Form 709 describe direct skips, indirect skips, GST trust transfers, and elections around automatic allocation.⁵ This is not an area for casual reporting. A trust that is supposed to be GST exempt should have a clear allocation history. If a trust is partly exempt and partly non-exempt, the family may need separate shares or a qualified severance. The paper trail should be strong enough for a future trustee, CPA, or beneficiary to understand decades later.

The fourth watch-out is state income tax. Trust taxation can depend on the residence of the grantor, trustee, beneficiaries, administration, assets, and governing law. The U.S. Supreme Court's 2019 Kaestner decision held that the presence of in-state beneficiaries alone did not allow North Carolina to tax undistributed trust income where the beneficiaries had no right to demand income and were uncertain to receive it.⁸ That decision is helpful, but it does not make state trust taxation simple. Situs and trustee selection should be coordinated with counsel.

The fifth watch-out is governance. A dynasty trust can create a durable structure, but it can also create resentment if beneficiaries do not understand the purpose. The trustee should know whether the trust is primarily for support, education, entrepreneurship, asset protection, tax planning, or long-term family capital. Beneficiaries do not need to control the trust, but they do need enough communication to understand how decisions are made.

The sixth watch-out is drafting for a world that changes. Tax law changes. Family circumstances change. States update trust codes. Beneficiaries move. Businesses are sold. Marriages end. New descendants are born. A dynasty trust should be drafted with enough flexibility to adapt through powers of appointment, trustee replacement provisions, distribution discretion, decanting authority where available, and clear fiduciary roles. Flexibility should be intentional, not accidental.

A dynasty trust is most compelling when three conditions line up. The family has or expects to have a taxable estate. The assets being transferred have meaningful growth potential. The family wants long-term governance and protection, not just a tax result. When all three are present, the dynasty trust can be one of the most powerful estate-planning tools available.

It can also fit for business owners and real estate families. If the value of a business or property portfolio could grow materially over the next decade, transferring non-voting or minority interests to a dynasty trust before that growth is obvious may produce a better result than waiting until after a sale process or recapitalization is underway. That planning requires valuation, legal coordination, and enough time to avoid the appearance that the value was already locked in.

For families already above the 2026 married-couple exemption amount, dynasty trusts usually deserve serious discussion. The annual exclusion is helpful, but it is too small to solve a large taxable estate by itself. In 2026, the annual exclusion is $19,000 per donee, or $38,000 if each spouse uses an exclusion for the same recipient.² That is useful for repeated family gifts, insurance-premium funding, or education planning, but it is not the same as moving a high-growth asset into a GST-exempt trust.

For families below the exemption, I would be more selective. If the estate is unlikely to be federally taxable and the assets are mostly low-basis marketable securities, aggressive dynasty-trust funding may create more basis and administration problems than estate-tax benefit. The better move may be a revocable trust, beneficiary review, annual gifts, 529 planning, charitable planning, or a simpler irrevocable structure for a specific purpose.

I would start with the family balance sheet, not the trust document. How much wealth is needed for the parents' lifetime security? How much is illiquid? How much is low-basis? How much is expected to grow? What assets might be sold in the next five to ten years? Which descendants are ready for responsibility, and which ones need guardrails?

Then I would separate the tax decision from the governance decision. A family may have a strong tax reason to move assets, but a weak governance plan. Or it may have a strong governance reason to use a trust even if federal estate tax is not the main issue. The best plans usually answer both questions at once.

Next, I would coordinate the attorney, CPA, valuation professional, and investment team before funding. The attorney drafts the trust and state-law design. The CPA handles gift tax reporting, GST allocation, grantor trust reporting, and income-tax modeling. The valuation professional supports hard-to-value transfers. Our role is to model the balance sheet, compare asset choices, evaluate investment and liquidity implications, and help keep the plan tied to the family's real goals.

The final step is ongoing review. A dynasty trust should not sit untouched for thirty years. The trustee, advisor, CPA, and attorney should periodically review investment policy, tax status, distributions, beneficiary circumstances, and changes in state or federal law. The whole point is to build something durable. Durable does not mean ignored.

Dynasty trusts can be powerful, but they are not magic. They work best when the family has enough wealth to justify the complexity, enough growth potential to make the tax math meaningful, and enough clarity to explain why the trust exists.

The right question is not, "Should every wealthy family have a dynasty trust?" The right question is, "Which part of the family's balance sheet should be protected from repeated transfer taxes, creditor risk, poor timing, and weak governance?" Sometimes the answer is a dynasty trust. Sometimes it is a simpler plan. The structure should follow the purpose.

This piece is educational. The specifics are a conversation with us, your estate attorney, and your CPA before acting. Our team can help model the trade-offs, coordinate the professionals, and make sure the trust strategy supports the broader plan rather than becoming a complicated document in search of a problem.

All my best,

Brandon VanLandingham, CFA, CMT, CFP

Founder / CIO

---

Reducing Capital Gains on a Highly Appreciated Portfolio

Charitable Remainder Trusts and the ILIT Wealth Replacement Strategy

[1] Internal Revenue Service, Rev. Proc. 2025-32. The revenue procedure states that Public Law 119-21, commonly known as the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, was enacted July 4, 2025, and that Section 70106 increased the basic exclusion amount to $15,000,000 for calendar year 2026. It also states that the GST exemption amount under Section 2631(c) is $15,000,000 for 2026. https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-drop/rp-25-32.pdf

[2] Internal Revenue Service, "Frequently asked questions on gift taxes," updated December 2025. The IRS states that the 2026 annual exclusion is $19,000 per donee, that two spouses can use $38,000 per donee, that certain tuition and medical payments may be excluded when paid correctly, and that gifted property generally carries the donor's basis. https://www.irs.gov/businesses/small-businesses-self-employed/frequently-asked-questions-on-gift-taxes

[3] 26 U.S.C. Sections 2601, 2611, 2612, and 2613, Cornell Law School Legal Information Institute. These sections impose the GST tax, define generation-skipping transfers, define taxable terminations, taxable distributions, direct skips, and define skip persons and non-skip persons. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/2601, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/2611, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/2612, and https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/2613

[4] 26 U.S.C. Sections 2631, 2641, 2642, and 2001, Cornell Law School Legal Information Institute. These sections define the GST exemption, applicable GST rate, inclusion ratio, and federal estate tax rate schedule. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/2631, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/2641, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/2642, and https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/2001

[5] Internal Revenue Service, "Instructions for Form 709 (2025)." The instructions discuss skip persons, direct skips, indirect skips, GST trust transfers, automatic allocation elections, gift-splitting mechanics, trust instrument attachments, and valuation support for gifts. https://www.irs.gov/instructions/i709

[6] Internal Revenue Service, Rev. Proc. 2025-32, 2026 tax rate tables. For taxable years beginning in 2026, estates and trusts reach the 37% ordinary income bracket above $16,000 of taxable income; married individuals filing jointly reach that bracket above $768,700. The same revenue procedure lists 2026 capital gains threshold amounts, including $16,250 for estates and trusts and $613,700 for married individuals filing jointly. https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-drop/rp-25-32.pdf

[7] 26 U.S.C. Section 1014, Cornell Law School Legal Information Institute. Section 1014 generally provides that the basis of property acquired from a decedent is the fair market value of the property at the date of death, subject to exceptions. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/1014

[8] North Carolina Department of Revenue v. Kimberley Rice Kaestner 1992 Family Trust, 588 U.S. ___ (2019), Justia U.S. Supreme Court Center. The Court held that in-state beneficiary residence alone did not empower North Carolina to tax undistributed trust income where the beneficiaries had no right to demand income and were uncertain to receive it. https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/588/18-457/

[9] 26 U.S.C. Section 671, Cornell Law School Legal Information Institute. Section 671 describes how trust income, deductions, and credits are included in computing the taxable income and credits of the grantor or another person when that person is treated as the owner of a trust portion under the grantor-trust rules. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/671

This piece is educational. It is not legal, tax, or accounting advice and is not a recommendation to take or refrain from any specific action. Tax law is fact-specific and changes regularly. Please coordinate any decisions discussed here with your attorney, your CPA, and Perissos before acting.

Perissos Private Wealth Management is a Registered Investment Adviser ("RIA"). Registration as an investment adviser does not imply a certain level of skill or training, and the content of this communication has not been approved or verified by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission or by any state securities authority. Perissos Private Wealth Management renders individualized investment advice to persons in a particular state only after complying with the state's regulatory requirements, or pursuant to an applicable state exemption or exclusion. All investments carry risk, and no investment strategy can guarantee a profit or protect from loss of capital. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

The information contained in this newsletter is intended to provide general information about market themes. It is not intended to offer investment advice. Investment advice will only be given after a client engages our services by executing the appropriate investment services agreement. Information regarding investment products and services is given solely to provide education regarding our investment philosophy and our strategies. You should not rely on any information provided in making investment decisions.

Market data, articles and other content in this material are based on generally available information and are believed to be reliable. Perissos Private Wealth Management does not guarantee the accuracy of the information contained in this material.

Perissos Private Wealth Management will provide all prospective clients with a copy of our current Form ADV, Part 2A (Disclosure Brochure), Part 2B (Supplemental Brochures), and Part 3 (Client Relationship Summary) prior to commencing an advisory relationship. You can also view these documents at any time at adviserinfo.sec.gov or by contacting us requesting a copy.